This is a 'structured' improvisation that I filmed in the studio this week. I say structured as I knew and had chosen the music beforehand which inevitably meant that I had imagined how I might dance to it when listening to it beforehand. After I finished improvising I wrote notes on all the factors that came into play while I was improvising. I compared it to the categories that Nakano and Okada named as the areas of attention dancers noted on their reflection in improvisation. I found that 'interaction with oneself' played a massive part. I noted that portraying a mood or feeling was most important to me. Factors such as the light, space and music affected this.
I thought about how developing areas noted in their categories could improve my improvisation. 'Switching'... could I change the texture of the movement more and the rhythm to make it more dynamic rather than getting stuck at a certain pace. 'Continuation', Lisa Nelson speaks about how various choreographers approach time in their improvisation with dancers. Could I push the boundaries of when is a natural start or finish... what happens if I improvise for longer than I would normally feel comfortable with?
Hi Catherine,
ReplyDeleteNice to see some of your thoughts in action! Do you improvise a lot? Would say that you approached this improvisation differently after doing research for BAPP?
It would be interesting to see how the piece develops after your reflective notes. Maybe a possible idea for your artefact - have you thought about what this might be yet?
Lisa x
Hi Catherine,
ReplyDeleteIt is good to see how your inquiry work is already having an impact on your professional practices. At the stage I am currently working at in my inquiry and within my job placement, I am not able to do this. I really like how you are using the existing literature you reflect on your practices.
I am finding in my observations that I am seeing many aspects of the literature emerge, particularly the key debates. Are you finding that any of your work so far contradicts the literature in any way?
I like Lisa's ideas about the artefact too.
Jess.
Hi Catherine,
ReplyDeleteI loved that improvisation piece! It's great seeing the immediate impact of your BAPP ideas reflected in your professional practice and vice versa. It'll also prove interesting, I presume, to analyse your insider-researcher position and experience in relation to the literature. How have you been getting on with it all?
Best,
Lara